<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruby client for querying SPARQL REST services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danbri.org/words/2008/01/07/247/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danbri.org/words/2008/01/07/247</link>
	<description>the web, the world, us, you and them</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:48:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Krantz</title>
		<link>http://danbri.org/words/2008/01/07/247/comment-page-1#comment-13373</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Krantz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 08:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danbri.org/words/2008/01/07/247#comment-13373</guid>
		<description>..and just last night I was looking for a Ruby client to do SPARQL queries. What a coincidence.

Regarding REXML I strongly suggest something else. It will grind to a halt for all but the smallest XML sets. A pragmatic way could be using Hpricot which is available for all platforms and magnitudes faster for working with tree structures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..and just last night I was looking for a Ruby client to do SPARQL queries. What a coincidence.</p>
<p>Regarding REXML I strongly suggest something else. It will grind to a halt for all but the smallest XML sets. A pragmatic way could be using Hpricot which is available for all platforms and magnitudes faster for working with tree structures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
