<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: </title>
	<atom:link href="http://danbri.org/words/2008/01/19/256/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danbri.org/words/2008/01/19/256</link>
	<description>the web, the world, us, you and them</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:48:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/index.en.html</title>
		<link>http://danbri.org/words/2008/01/19/256/comment-page-1#comment-13471</link>
		<dc:creator>http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/index.en.html</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danbri.org/words/2008/01/19/256#comment-13471</guid>
		<description>This reminds me of recent interview with a neo-nazi in a Norwegian newspaper. The journalist asked if the Internet was important to them, and he responded &quot;if it wasn&#039;t for the Internet, I&#039;d have to kill you.&quot;

Driving this underground is not the solution. In fact, this was one of the motivations I had for getting involved with Semantic Web in the first place, we need mechanisms to annotate objectional content, not for censorship, but for expressing an informed opinion that people have a chance to find. This is also one of the motivating use cases for for POWDER.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of recent interview with a neo-nazi in a Norwegian newspaper. The journalist asked if the Internet was important to them, and he responded &#8220;if it wasn&#8217;t for the Internet, I&#8217;d have to kill you.&#8221;</p>
<p>Driving this underground is not the solution. In fact, this was one of the motivations I had for getting involved with Semantic Web in the first place, we need mechanisms to annotate objectional content, not for censorship, but for expressing an informed opinion that people have a chance to find. This is also one of the motivating use cases for for POWDER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
