Comments on: Graph URIs in SPARQL: Using UUIDs as named views http://danbri.org/words/2008/02/09/273 the web, the world, us, you and them Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:48:30 +0000 hourly 1 By: Morten Høybye Frederiksen http://danbri.org/words/2008/02/09/273/comment-page-1#comment-13582 Morten Høybye Frederiksen Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:05:49 +0000 http://danbri.org/words/2008/02/09/273#comment-13582 Why use UUIDs and not HTTP URIs? Regarding the indirection and named graph usage, this is what the <a href="http://wiki.foaf-project.org/ScutterVocab" rel="nofollow">ScutterVocab</a> does (also in SparqlPress). The actual TOC stuff is a little more difficult, mostly with regards to duplicates, but I don't see any problems in grouping (!) documents by "source". Why use UUIDs and not HTTP URIs?

Regarding the indirection and named graph usage, this is what the ScutterVocab does (also in SparqlPress).

The actual TOC stuff is a little more difficult, mostly with regards to duplicates, but I don’t see any problems in grouping (!) documents by “source”.

]]>