Comments on: Quick clarification on SPARQL extensions and “Lock-in” http://danbri.org/words/2009/10/12/470 the web, the world, us, you and them Fri, 15 Jan 2010 01:28:41 +0000 hourly 1 By: Surveying and Classifying SPARQL Extensions « Lost Boy http://danbri.org/words/2009/10/12/470/comment-page-1#comment-17537 Surveying and Classifying SPARQL Extensions « Lost Boy Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:58:13 +0000 http://danbri.org/words/?p=470#comment-17537 [...] whether a query uses Property Functions would therefore require a validator (such as the one that Dan Brickley describes here) to either have explicit knowledge of the function, e.g. based on its URI, or for implementors to [...] [...] whether a query uses Property Functions would therefore require a validator (such as the one that Dan Brickley describes here) to either have explicit knowledge of the function, e.g. based on its URI, or for implementors to [...]

]]> By: john225 http://danbri.org/words/2009/10/12/470/comment-page-1#comment-17527 john225 Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:12:38 +0000 http://danbri.org/words/?p=470#comment-17527 There is a SPARQL validator here: http://www.sparql.org/validator.html Does quite do all you suggest, but perhaps it can be extended? There is a SPARQL validator here:

http://www.sparql.org/validator.html

Does quite do all you suggest, but perhaps it can be extended?

]]> By: danbri http://danbri.org/words/2009/10/12/470/comment-page-1#comment-17526 danbri Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:29:11 +0000 http://danbri.org/words/?p=470#comment-17526 See also http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/rdfsparql.html and http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Extensions_Proposed_By_OpenLink See also http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/rdfsparql.html and http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Extensions_Proposed_By_OpenLink

]]> By: Danny Ayers http://danbri.org/words/2009/10/12/470/comment-page-1#comment-17525 Danny Ayers Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:12:51 +0000 http://danbri.org/words/?p=470#comment-17525 We know Kingsley (& the team) have their hearts in the right place. But you must admit he's teaseabile :) More on topic, sending experience stories and potential exts. to the SPARQL spec can only be a good thing - OpenLink have been very good. We know Kingsley (& the team) have their hearts in the right place. But you must admit he’s teaseabile :)
More on topic, sending experience stories and potential exts. to the SPARQL spec can only be a good thing – OpenLink have been very good.

]]>