RDFa in Drupal 7: last call for feedback before alpha release

Stéphane has just posted a call for feedback on the Drupal 7 RDFa design, before the first official alpha release.

First reaction above all, is that this is great news! Very happy to see this work maturing.

I’ve tried to quickly suggest some tweaks to the vocab, by hacking his diagram in photoshop. All it really shows is that I’ve forgotten how to use photoshop, but I’ll upload it here anyway.

So if you click through to the full image, you can see my rough edits.

I’d suggest:

  1. Use (dcterms) dc:subject as the way of pointing from a document to it’s SKOS subject.
  2. Use (dcterms) dc:creator as the relationship between a document and the person that created it (note that in FOAF, we now declare foaf:maker to map as an equivalentProperty to (dcterms)dc:creator).
  3. Distinguish between the description of the person versus their account in the Drupal system; I would use foaf:Person for the human, and sioc:User (a kind of foaf:OnlineAccount) as the drupal account. The foaf property to link from the former to the latter is foaf:account (new name for foaf:holdsAccount).
  4. Focus on SIOC where it is most at-home: in modelling the structure of the discussion; threading, comments and dialog.
  5. Provide a generated URI for the person. I don’t 100% understand Stephane’s comment, “Hash URIs for identifying things different from the page describing them can be implemented quite easily but this case hasn’t emerged in core” but perhaps this will be difficult? I’d suggest using URIs ending “userpage#!person” so the fragment IDs can’t clash with HTML usage.

If the core release can provide this basic structure, including a hook for describing the human person rather than the site-specific account (ie. sioc:User) then extensions should be able to add their own richness. The current markup doesn’t quite work for that end, as the human user is only described indirectly (unless  I understand current reading of sioc:User).

Anyway, I’m nitpicking! This is really great, and a nice and well-deserved boost for the RDFa community.

WOT in RDFa?

(This post is written in RDFa…)

To the best of my knowledge, Ludovic Hirlimann‘s PGP fingerprint is 6EFBD26FC7A212B2E093 B9E868F358F6C139647C. You might also be interested in his photos on flickr, or his workplace, Mozilla Messaging. The GPG key details were checked over a Skype video call with me, Ludo and Kaare A. Larsen.

This blog post isn’t signed, the URIs it referenced don’t use SSL, and the image could be switched by evildoers at any time! But the question’s worth asking: is this kind of scruffy key info useful, if there’s enough of it? If I wrote it somehow in Thunderbird’s editor instead, would it be easier to sign? Will 99.9% of humans ever know enough of what’s going on to understand what signing a bunch of complex markup means?

For earlier discussion of this kind of thing, see Joseph Reagle’s Key-free Trust piece (“Does Google Show How the Semantic Web Could Replace Public Key Infrastructure?”). It’s more PKI-free trust than PK-free.

My ’70s Schoolin’ (in RDFa)

I went to Hamsey Green school in the 1970s.

Looking in the UK Govt datasets, I see it is listed there with a homepage of ‘http://www.hamsey-green-infant.surrey.sch.uk’ (which doesn’t seem to work).

Some queries I’m trying via the SPARQL dataset (I’ll update this post if I make them work…)

First a general query, from which I found the URL manually, …

select distinct ?x ?y where { ?x <http ://education.data.gov.uk/def/school/websiteAddress> ?y . }

Then I can go back into the data, and find other properties of the school:

PREFIX sch-ont:  <http://education.data.gov.uk/def/school/>
select DISTINCT ?x ?p ?z WHERE
{
?x sch-ont:websiteAddress "http://www.hamsey-green-infant.surrey.sch.uk" .
?x ?p ?z .
}

Results in json

How to make this presentable? I can’t get output=html to work, but if I run this ‘construct’ query it creates a simple flat RDF document:

PREFIX sch-ont:  <http://education.data.gov.uk/def/school/>
CONSTRUCT {
 ?x ?p ?z .
}
WHERE
{
?x sch-ont:websiteAddress "http://www.hamsey-green-infant.surrey.sch.uk" .
?x ?p ?z .
}

So, where are we here? We see two RDF datasets about the same school. One is the simple claim that I attended the

school at some time in the past (1976-1978, in fact). The other describes many of its current attributes; most of which may be different now from in the past. In my sample RDFa, I used the most popular Web link for the school to represent it; in the Edubase government data, it has a Web site address but it seems not to be current.

Assuming we’d used the same URIs for the school’s homepage (or indeed for the school itself) then these bits of data could be joined.

Perhaps a more compelling example of data linking would be to show this schools data mixed in with something like MySociety’s excellent interactive travel maps? Still, the example above shows that basic “find people who went to my school” queries should be very possible…